Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sedevacantist fasting practices


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was G7 deleted. Geschichte (talk) 20:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Sedevacantist fasting practices

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not a notable topic, not deserving of its own article. Moreover, the topic is not supported by any secondary source which tackles the topic. The only secondary source of the whole article does not mention Sedevacantists at all. Veverve (talk) 10:29, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Veverve (talk) 10:29, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Veverve (talk) 10:29, 29 May 2021 (UTC)


 * That source does mention sedevacantists, in footnote 40 on page 175, but says nothing about their fasting practices. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:05, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom. Can't find a single source; no books, scholarly articles, journals, nothing. — Berrely  • Talk∕Contribs 11:05, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:06, 29 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete My, but WP can be an educational experience at times. This article adds nothing to Sedevacantism and shouldn't be a standalone. Also WP:OR. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:39, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sedevacantism. Or Delete. I'm frankly indifferent, and I don't think I can find sufficient additional sources unless we tentatively accept the Catholic blogosphere. I'm also the only editor who has edited the page substantially, so feel free to speedy close this if you would like. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 16:44, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete -- This strikes me as actually about the strict application of traditional Catholic practice on fasting, adding nothing that is specific to this Catholic traditionalist splinter. Possibly repurpose as "traditional Catholic practice on fasting", but I expect we have an article on that somewhere.  Peterkingiron (talk) 13:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't think that any consistent fasting practice exists among sedevacantists, just as many other other traditions are not consistent. It is a catch-all term for people who believe that the papacy is vacant, but there is no general agreement among them about how long it has been vacant. Fasting practices are usually those that existed in the wider Roman Catholic church before whatever date it is believed it became vacant. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:53, 30 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.