Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sedmikostelí


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  09:00, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Sedmikostelí

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NBOOK nor GNG. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  17:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 17:57, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 17:57, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Speedy Keep "Translated into eleven languages and a runaway bestseller in Spain". Yet another vexatious nomination, contrary to WP:BEFORE. Andrew D. (talk) 19:55, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - notable book, see,  or the list of reviews at the website of the distributor (Kosmas.cz) -all were published by notable literature critics/authors in notable media, please ask for detail if anyone has any doubts. Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 20:54, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   16:48, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per Andrew Davidson and Vejvančický. James500 (talk) 22:01, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect pending someone introducing some accurate, verifiable information that isn't already included in Miloš Urban. Having a one-sentence article that only duplicates a fraction of the relevant information in the main article is unhelpful. No comment on notability or potential to become more than a useless non-article. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 23:26, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have expanded this article from the source provided by Andrew Davidson. To be honest I would have no problems with the article being merged into Miloš Urban for the time being, as they are both short articles. Urban is a pretty significant author in CR though, and there is no doubt a proper article could be written about him; I will try to get round to it at some point. At any rate, deletion nominations for books such as this by authors such as this without due process are fairly cynical, and I daresay there are better ways to approach it. Jdcooper (talk) 22:29, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.