Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sedreck Fields


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  21:19, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Sedreck Fields

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable boxer Peter Rehse (talk) 18:53, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 18:53, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related page because both these boxers are remarkable only for their loosing record and who they fought against. They have no coverage.
 * Peter Rehse (talk) 19:01, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep both. Notable losers are still notable.  Fields had a noteworthy upset win over Shannon Briggs, while Wofford's astonishing 17-102-2 record nevertheless earned him notice for his durability.  I added a few sources. Also, I question the utility of bundling nominations of fighters who have little in common; since some AfD regulars might notice only the name in the heading of a nomination, in future I'd suggest fighters like these be nominated separately.--Arxiloxos (talk) 02:11, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Fighting notable fighters does not make one notable--see WP:NOTINHERITED. Papaursa (talk) 01:47, 27 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete both Besides both of the them having terrible records, they fail to meet WP:NBOX and the lack of significant coverage means they also don't meet WP:GNG. As I said above, notability is not inherited through having lost to some fighters who are notable. Papaursa (talk) 01:47, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Neither fighter meets WP:NBOX or WP:GNG. Notability is not inherited. Jakejr (talk) 18:11, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   14:21, 2 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Neither have any kind of notability based on reliable sources. Just a few passing mentions. Gm545 (talk) 15:58, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete both Neither meets the general notability standard or the one for boxing.Mdtemp (talk) 17:31, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.