Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seduction literature


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:49, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Seduction literature

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't seem to be notable as a) a sub-genre of self-help books or alternately b) a literary phenomenon in the "seduction community." Coverage tends to discuss the named books as part of the "seduction community" phenomenon; there's no indication that "seduction literature" is a notable thing in and of itself. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 03:58, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Concur with the nom; while the "seduction community" itself is notable, that notability does not transfer to various related topics. They can be merged into the main article if appropriate. Kuguar03 (talk) 05:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I would have thought this was independently notable but apparently not - I can find no significant coverage in reliable sources of "seduction literature" having a meaning anything like what this article suggests. (Lots of NSFW content, though.)  Seeing as "seduction community" seems to be largely defined as "adherents of seduction literature", any relevant content can be discussed on that article. - DustFormsWords (talk) 05:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - As per nominator. --Bobbyd2011 (talk) 07:38, 14 February 2011 (UTC) confirmed sockpuppet
 * Merge into seduction community, not notable by itself, really should be a part of the main article.  1 2 3 Hedgehog  4 5 6  09:54, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge. Can't find anything to establish independent notability. If kept, the article could easily be (ab)used to stealth spam wikipedia with non-notable titles. --Quartermaster (talk) 14:02, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Not seeing anything notable or worth keeping; Seduction community is notable enough, but does not warrant a fork like this. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:01, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not a recognized subgenre of literature. I don't agree with the above comment that seduction community is notable and encyclopedia-worthy either, but that's a AfD debate for another day. Carrite (talk) 19:05, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.