Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seductive lying

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Postdlf 00:31, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

Seductive lying
In my opinion this is not a subject. Worse, the title is ambiguous. Deb 07:04, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. We already have an article on lying, and this doesn't add anything useful.  It's an invitation to original research, too. --TenOfAllTrades (talk/contrib) 16:29, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. What TenOfAllTrades said. Quale 23:18, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- only 1 live link-to. Also possibly contentious -- resds like an ex post facto part-justification for a one-night-stand -- ?NPOV? --Simon Cursitor 06:52, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. And I wouldn't have bothered to vote except that I like the idea of an invitation to conduct original research on seductive lying. Dystopos 03:15, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.