Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/See Monkey Songs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:21, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

See Monkey Songs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Some sources exist (e.g., ), but this company falls short of meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. North America1000 09:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: this is linked to the See Monkey Do Monkey record label, so conceivably the two articles could be merged. However, I'm not sure the latter article passes notability either. Richard3120 (talk) 15:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 16:51, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I cannot seem to find anything beyond what the nominator describes: this fails GNG. Vanamonde (talk) 18:15, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- fails GNG and CorpDepth. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:00, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:CORPDEPTH. -- Dane 2007  talk 19:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.