Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/See You Next Tuesday (band) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete, no consensus to overturn the prior deletion decision; they fail WP:BAND - the only sources provided are Youtube and other self-promotional, which even if believed and 100% correct still demonstrate no meeting of the criteria at WP:BAND, e.g., only 1 album issued on a label. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 05:15, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

See You Next Tuesday (band)
AfDs for this article: 

Was agreed for deletion but was recreated. Still fails notability. -RiverHockey (talk) 19:29, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fixing malformed, nomination, I abstain. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:14, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep at this point. They've signed with a relatively notable indie label in Ferret Records and have an album out that's being reviewed at various places, including onemetal.com, about.com, Metal Temple.com, etc. They're touring internationally, from the looks of this, and Exclaim! covered one of their concerts in NYC here. I think they could use some more reliable sources about the band, but they're definitely just above the bar. Tony Fox (arf!) 21:50, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Regarding the "written like an ad" comments below - that's a rewrite issue, not a delete issue. If this is deemed notable, I can certainly take a shot at rewriting it to deal with that. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:36, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * delete --- still written like an advert, still in first person, only a marginal shift in fundamental notability (they got signed to an indie label, but no media coverage). Watch out, there's a "lollipop hip-hop with slick production" album with the same name covered in the Voice. --- tqbf  22:32, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - written like an ad.   jj137  ( Talk ) 16:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep; there's a modicum of notability here, and the article can be revised so that it doesn't read so much like an advert.Alcarillo (talk) 17:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.