Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seed Herbarium Image Project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  Sandstein  17:34, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Seed Herbarium Image Project

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

PROD removed by anonymous user (see article talkpage). Original PROD rationale was "wikipedia is not a webhost, gallery, or similar. Press releases and self-published sources are not reliable 3rd party sources". I've found nothing since to support notability nor verfiability so have to add those to my original reasoning. Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:27, 13 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge to the Arnold Arboretum. It is one of their projects.  Merge should trim the material appropriately, especially the image gallery aspect. -- Whpq (talk) 17:03, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  NuclearWarfare  contact me My work  21:30, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:38, 21 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:43, 27 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep as a major project of international significance. The illustrations are representative only--the purpose is not to show the gallery, but to appropriately indicate the information available at the resources. appropriate description. DGG (talk) 04:13, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure whether I want to simply keep it or merge it. at any rate, deletion should not happen. The images all appear copyvios according to the commons and so they will be deleted, removing the gallery aspect of the entry. Since the Arboretum is notable, covering this project in its article would not require a separate proof of notability for the project or an independant one at that. - Mgm|(talk) 09:40, 27 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.