Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seelie Court (Dungeons & Dragons)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of Dungeons & Dragons deities. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:53, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Seelie Court (Dungeons & Dragons)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This group does not establish notability independent of Dungeons & Dragons through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 14:34, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge into List of Dungeons & Dragons deities. BOZ (talk) 15:19, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete the fallback position of merge this non-notable item into a list of other non-notable fictional things has just resulted in a decades worth of unencyclopedic lists. Ridernyc (talk) 23:31, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge to parent concept, which is Seelie Court in celtic mythology. Better a robust article covering the longtiudinal portrayals than piecemeal coverage. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:40, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. A redirect or merge to List of Dungeons & Dragons deities or Seelie Court would also be acceptable, but I think deletion is more appropriate. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:42, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge with Seelie Court in celtic mythology. Deletion should be last resort. 42of8 (talk) 19:10, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * transwiki to a fanboy site that would love this trivia. As for Wikipedia, content fails WP:GNG and so deletion or merge are the policy options. It is unclear to me that having solely primary sourced claim of "looky looky! I seen the seely court in D&D stuff!!!!11!!!" is valuable content to merge to Seelie Court, but "In popular culture" trivia clean up is an issue out of scope for this forum.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  12:19, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Well yeah, some of us don't draw some arbitrary pop-culture line at 1900. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:58, 12 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge Per Casliber. Also note that none of the delete votes above adequately justifies why a merge would not be the most policy-based alternative under WP:ATD. Jclemens (talk) 21:37, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.