Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seer stones and Urim Thummim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. I don't think it's a likely redirect term, but if someone wants to redirect it, go for it. Proto :: ►  16:12, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Seer stones and Urim Thummim

 * — (View AfD)

This is simply an unclear and unsourced essay. There is a much better article here Urim and Thummim. I would just take to prod but I'm hoping there is a basis to speedy it. Also I considered a bold redirect but the name itself is a mess so that too makes no sense.Obina 20:46, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm fairly certain that this does NOT meet any criteria for speedy deletion. However, it is an irrelevant (although appropriately sourced) essay.  Everything that matters has already been said in the main article, Urim and Thummim. YechielMan 21:16, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * If the name is an even remotely feasible search term it should probably be redirected. I don't see objectionable content that the edit history has to be deleted. ~ trialsanderrors 21:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. A bit too much content for an A1, but nothing that's not in the main article.  I don't think it's worth a redirect. Tevildo 22:10, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Redirects are cheap, but this is going a little far.  Probably the only people it would help are those looking for the original article.  The content appears to be from the 1911 Britannica, and is duplicated here.  The main article Urim and Thummim can include a link to that site if we want the content.  delldot | talk 02:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.