Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seghill RFC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  18:14, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Seghill RFC

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails to meet WikiProject Rugby union/Notability Cabayi (talk) 18:36, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 00:42, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 00:42, 2 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. Their club website says they provided a player to the British Lions in the 1920s called William Wallace, so it passes Notability Clubs. Szzuk (talk) 18:19, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - As above, qualifies under the Rugby part of the clubs notability rules. Deathlibrarian (talk) 06:34, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep as it appears to meet the notability standards by providing a player to the British Lions. L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:36, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment I would take the claim that they supplied a lions player with a pinch of salt as there was only one William Wallace that played on the 1924 British Lions tour to South Africa and this club Percy Park RFC claims that he was their player at the time. William Wallace is a common name or he may have played for both teams. And please don't forget that project guidelines do not trump NORG or GNG and neither seem to be met. --Dom from Paris (talk) 15:44, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Percy Park is 7 miles from Seghill, likely he played for both teams. Szzuk (talk) 16:59, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * , are there any reliable, independent sources for the claim. If so I'd happily withdraw the nomination. Cabayi (talk) 19:13, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 05:51, 9 March 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:48, 17 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.