Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sehrawat (clan)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  13:24, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Sehrawat (clan)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The page belongs to Category:Jat clans, or one of its subcategories. All the pages of these categories lack the very basic notability guidelines. Failure WP:GNG. Must discussed and deleted per WP:NOT. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:08, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:08, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:08, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment It is pure misrepresentation to say that All the pages of these categories lack the very basic notability guidelines. For example, see Tomar clan. This habit of using boilerplate text when nominating via AfD or PROD - which you do often, Krishna - needs to stop. - Sitush (talk) 05:49, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment It certainly does exist as a Jat clan - see this and this. - Sitush (talk) 05:56, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:09, 1 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:56, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Delete They do need to be discussed individually unfortunately, although the vast majority are being deleted at AfD. I couldn't find reliable sources to verify that this one is notable. Boleyn (talk) 20:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.