Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seinfeld logo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete the article and orfud the images. ~ trialsanderrors 08:03, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Seinfeld logo


WP:NOT for image galleries, especially ones full of fair use images. cholmes75 (chit chat) 19:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Let me get this straight: a TV show's logo changed colors from season to season? And you want an article based on that?  Wavy G 20:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge and redirect. At best, create a gallery on the bottom of Seinfeld or at Commons.  Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim  20:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Nope, did not think about fairuse images. Delete. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim  20:26, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete before a trend starts and we have an article on Elaine Benes Changing Hairstyles in Seinfeld.OfficeGirl 20:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't give anyone ideas. -- Fan-1967 20:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete Where is the notability. My tv picture changes colour 50 times a second. Does it need an article. scope_creep 20:56, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Merge to the main article on Seinfeld as the information is interesting enough that I'd include it, though it could be accomplished with descriptions instead of images to get around copyright concerns.
 * Delete this garbage, although it's appropriately "about nothing". wikipediatrix 21:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak merge with the main article. And by merge I mean add one sentence to the main article. There is nothing notable about the Seinfeld logo and its apparent variations to justify any more attention than that. Lose the images completely unless one is used already on the article page. 23skidoo 15:43, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Useless. TheRealFennShysa 21:23, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Richmeistertalk 04:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.