Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seizure (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) C T J F 8 3  chat 05:27, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Seizure (novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete. non-notable per WP:BK. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:06, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  --  Marcus   Qwertyus   23:29, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Evidently notable per WP:BK. Nomination seems to be part of disruptive deletion spree contrary to deletion policy. Colonel Warden (talk) 05:50, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Oh come off it.  I added sources as well.--Milowent • talkblp-r  17:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Clear KeepSadads (talk) 20:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as of now, there are four RS on the page, each of which appear to be a newspaper review of the novel, as well as documentation of the bestseller list placement. Jclemens (talk) 20:18, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.