Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sekiraqa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Article is now a stub in English, no other delete arguments have been put forward. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:15, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Sekiraqa

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article isn't in English, so it doesn't belong on English Wikipedia. Quanticle (talk) 04:33, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This is a new entry, standard practice is to allow 2 weeks for translation, then bring to AfD. See Pages needing translation into English. Hairhorn (talk) 09:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep for the time being. It hasn't had its chance at WP:PNT yet. Re-nominate in two weeks. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 00:18, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Pretty sure it's notable. Favonian (talk) 10:00, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete . Had I seen it first I would probably have marked it as speedy-delete. It's potentially notable since it's about a Kosovar "mafia" family where at least one member is supposed to be on an international search warrant. However, it's written in horribly bad Swedish and unsourced, and the content is such that there are clear WP:BLP concerns without WP:RS! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomas e (talk • contribs)
 * Comment. I have added two references, one of them being an Interpol arrest warrant. Regrettably, some of the most promising Google News hits are from the BBC Archive, and they charge for access.  Am trying to mobilize sufficient boldness to translate the admittedly rather horrible Swedish prose.  Favonian (talk) 12:38, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Changed to neutral after the BLP and referencing issue was dealt with. Tomas e (talk) 11:41, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Ta bort Förtal på svenska! (Artikeln behandlar den misstänkte som om han dömdes.) Werner Heisenberg (talk) 04:03, 12 January 2010 (UTC) Keep. I've stubbed the article to remove the defamatory Swedish content. The references strongly suggest that Enver Sekiraqa is notable, and that the article may be appropriately expanded in a manner not inconsistent with the biographies of living persons policy. Werner Heisenberg (talk) 04:26, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Question It's good that you stubbed it. But does that mean that you propose a refocus and move' to "Enver Sekiraqa"? The article was previously about the whole family. Tomas e (talk) 11:41, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Since we only have sources for Enver Sekiraqa right now, that's all we should write about. It would be a BLP violation to claim that the whole family is mobbed up, without a shred of evidence. Werner Heisenberg (talk) 22:56, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.