Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selected Hilarity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 20:09, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Selected Hilarity

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As a group, fails WP:BASIC and WP:ENTERTAINER. Logical Cowboy (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. References provided discuss individual members or only briefly mention group, not providing independent significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG.  --  Wikipedical (talk) 05:14, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Disagree with proposed deletion. Group member Bryan Tucker is the current co-head writer for Saturday Night Live and references the group in nearly every printed interview. The St. Martin's Griffin 2012 publishing "Duke Sucks" references the group. They are notable and still relevant. (talk) 05:37, 26 February 2014
 * But he is not a third party. does anyone talking about Tucker talk about the influence of the group on Tucker's work? it's third party notice of the subject that makes them eligible for a stand alone article -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  22:43, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG.  Most of the references are either niche publications, or about specific group members, not the group itself.  "Bryan Tucker is notable and he mentions the group every time he's interviewed" is just a special case of WP:INHERIT. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.