Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selena Du (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Entirely and hopelessly promotional. Deleted as G11.  DGG ( talk ) 18:43, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Selena Du
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Repost (Articles for deletion/Selena Du); "db-repost" was declined, but the article, at first glance, does not contain any significant new proof of the person notability and information reliability. OneLittleMouse (talk) 05:30, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - and I have tagged it (again) as such. Of course the articles are the same. The last discussion was closed less than a month ago and all of the "sources" provided are purple links for me - which means I looked at them all during the course of the last discussion. There is a detailed analysis of those sources in the last AFD. The article even contains the same silly charity claims I commented on last time. This is clearly an attempt to contradict the consensus of the last AFD. As far as I can see, the lede is exactly the same as I remember it and the body of the article is exactly the same, but with some of the removed puffery re-inserted. Stalwart 111  13:28, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * comment I had to decline the G4 speedy. It had previously be declined by another administrator. But there is nothing to prevent a speedy for another reason, and I'm going to speedy delete this as G-11 promotional. it's even worse this time around.  DGG ( talk ) 18:38, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.