Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selena Y. Du


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bbb23 (talk) 17:12, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Selena Y. Du
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable pageant winner. Many of the sources in the article are unreliable. There was a former AfD, Articles for deletion/Selena Du, for a differently titled article about the same subject. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:50, 6 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- non notable subject and coverage is insufficient. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:30, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:42, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:42, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:42, 6 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt Fails GNG. This has been deleted twice before although under a different name. Looks like the author used the middle initial to create it again? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:14, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete winner of a non-notable beauty pageant.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:05, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and keep an eye on the article creator, who hasn't edited anything outside this topic. Lepricavark (talk) 02:37, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * delete fails GNG, sources are unreliable. Note that this article creator also created the Chinese wikipedia article, and the Japanese and French ones were created by another SPA.--Prisencolin (talk) 03:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems to fall short of requirements for GNG, and as the subject's main claim to fame appears to be that of a model, that would fall under WP:NMODEL, and none of the requirements appear to be met there. Im also having source checking problems, can't tell if these sources are reliable or not. Irondome (talk) 16:44, 12 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.