Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selfo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete - WP:NOR. DS (talk) 04:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Selfo
Cannot find any reliable sources for this game, maybe a hoax? VivioFa teFan  (Talk, Sandbox) 02:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. My Gsearch didn't hit anything remotely related to a game named Selfo, so it appears to fail WP:V and therefore also WP:N.  No idea if it's a hoax.  --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 02:58, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * There's actually a source cited in the article, in a "References" section. It's a paper by a Francisco J. Vico, an associate professor at the University of Málaga, undoubtedly one and the same as .  It's not actually a published paper, however.  There's nothing at the URL given.  Nor is it a peer reviewed journal article. Uncle G (talk) 03:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, no indication that this is a notable board game. Lankiveil (talk) 13:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC).
 * In my opinion, the discussion of whether the description of a newly proposed game is or is not trustworthy is out of context here. The class of games (not just a game, indeed) that I have identified and described in an internal report of Universidad de Málaga is an original contribution to the field of connection games. This fact has been checked by myself. But it is true that it lacks from evidences (so to say) to claim that this proposal is popular enough in the community of strategy games. For this reason, I have decided to delete the article and perform an extra effort of diffusion before actually reporting it in WP.  Thanks for your comments. fjvico (talk) 17:33, 11 January 2008 (UTC).
 * The class of games [&hellip;] that I have identified and described in an internal report [&hellip;] is an original contribution to the field of connection games. &mdash; Please read our Verifiability and No original research policies. You have come to the wrong place.  Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia.  It is a tertiary source.  It is not a publisher of primary research.  Please publish original contributions to a field in an appropriate academic journal. Uncle G (talk) 17:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.