Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selling England by the Pound Tour


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America1000 02:03, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Selling England by the Pound Tour

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An indiscriminate collection of information, either unsourced or cited to unreliable sources. No reason this needs to be a content fork of the parent album. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  06:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 April 26.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 09:42, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  11:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Keep. According to WP:NTOUR concert tours are notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Peter Gabriel's costume for this tour has generated independent discussion, making the tour itself notable. if they have received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. See e.g. Without Frontiers: The Life & Music of Peter Gabriel By Daryl Easle. http://www.rollingstone.com/music/pictures/readers-poll-your-favorite-prog-rock-albums-of-all-time-20120725/7-genesis-selling-england-by-the-pound-0033753 Genesis: The Complete Guide to Their Music By Chris Welch. Ross-c (talk) 21:20, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * No, that is an argument for keeping the "Tour" section of Selling England by the Pound, and that source does not talk about this tour using this name, presumably because this was not a tour but a series of more gigs. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  05:43, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * A quick google shows that the tour is commonly named using the title from this article. Ross-c (talk) 06:01, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 09:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 04:49, 10 May 2015 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Relisting comment: Final relist. <span style="color: #3BB9FF; font-style: italic; font-family: Lato, sans-serif'">Esquivalience t 01:43, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: several passing mentions does not establish notability per WP:GNG. <span style="color: #3BB9FF; font-style: italic; font-family: Lato, sans-serif'">Esquivalience t 20:00, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="color: #3BB9FF; font-style: italic; font-family: Lato, sans-serif'">Esquivalience t 01:43, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - this tour of a major band seems perfectly notable, especially as there are references to it even today., , , . I'm not quite sure why nominator thinks it wasn't actually a tour. —Мандичка YO 😜 02:02, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I didn't say that, but rather I suspect Wikipedia and other places have coined this tour name as a neologism and poor quality sources (one source you supplied is self published and one is a Wikipedia mirror) have picked it up. <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  09:41, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.