Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sellmark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:20, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Sellmark

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can find no secondary sources of any significance to support this article. WP:GNG Ducknish (talk) 03:01, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - This appears to be another non-notable company, I have found zero reliable third-party sources to establish notability. Considering that the article gives little information such as history, there is little to help broaden the search aside from that it is Texas-based. SwisterTwister   talk  06:00, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 15:20, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 15:20, 28 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment – This company is somehow related to the Belorussian Beltex Optics (Russian: Белтекс Оптик). I do not know if it is a distributor or a subsidiary. The Belorussian company was one of the largest producers of binocular and military optics in the Soviet Union, at a time when Soviet binoculars dominated the cheaper end of the world market. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 19:39, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 21:08, 5 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete does not appear to be a notable company. Sources do not exist that meet the WP:GNG. Might support a redirect if someone can verify a stronger connection to Beltex Optics. Vcessayist (talk) 01:32, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.