Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selman Munson & Lerner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 16:08, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Selman Munson & Lerner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Originally deleted by WP:PROD with the rationale "A Texas-based law firm with 14 attorneys, and not the hint of a suggestion of a whisper of what makes it more distinctive than any other small law firm in the US. Texas, or even Austin." I believe that rationale still holds. The article is unsourced except for some external links. There may be coverage of the cases the firm handles, but where's the evidence that it meets WP:CORP criteria for inclusion? ~Anachronist (talk) 21:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete:A WP:SPA article about a firm going about its business. No evidence of encyclopaedic notability provided or found. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 07:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:CORP. The sources cited are respectively the company's website, the schedule for a conference which doesn't mention the company at all, two announcements of people moving jobs and buying shares and an announcement of an event hosted by the company. All of these fail WP:CORPDEPTH. I can't find anything better, only more press releases and directory listings.  Hut 8.5  17:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I found no indications, in independent reliable sources or otherwise, to suggest that this law firm is anything more than an ordinary non-notable business. --Arxiloxos (talk) 21:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:SPIP, GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing ++ 19:08, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * delete does not meet WP:GNG or other relevant criteria. See above rationales. Perhaps the creator/company in question mistook us for LinkedIn. Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:55, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.