Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semiaquatic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus; default to keep. STANDARD DISCLAIMER: THIS MEANS NO CONSENSUS NOW AND ONLY DEFAULTS TO KEEP. THIS MAY CHANGE IN THE FUTURE. DO NOT CITE THIS AFD AS A REASON TO SUPPORT OR OPPOSE A MERGE OR REDIRECT. Johnleemk | Talk 13:35, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Semiaquatic
Delete. This should be a wikitionary definition at best. Lockley 07:10, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and transwiki. --Terence Ong 10:02, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems a fairly standard term, often found in descriptions of plants and animals; should have an explanation here.  Smerdis of Tlön 14:57, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wiktionary, and delete. Wikipedia isn't a dictionary. Stifle 00:22, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, likely link/search term. Kappa 08:14, 22 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.