Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semih Aydilek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete... twice... still WP:SNOWing as far as I can tell. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 19:04, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Semih Aydilek

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence of meeting WP:ATHLETE by playing in a pro-league, U19 appearances do not confer notability. Kevin McE (talk) 17:55, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Birmingham is in the Premier League, a fully professional league, but this player has never actually taken the field for Birmingham. If he did so then he would deserve an article. Being listed on the roster is not sufficient. He should actually have played. Injuries may have prevented him from playing earlier. (The same issue has come up before, for other players). EdJohnston (talk) 17:31, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, per Ed's understanding of the soccer notability guidelines. Disruptive behavior by anon who removed prod doesn't help me, either. Daniel Case (talk) 18:03, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Kevin McE (talk) 20:18, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly fails WP:ATHLETE and a couple of mentions in local papers does not confer notability. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  21:42, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - I agree with the nom that the subject fails to meet WP:Athlete, and until he walks onto the field in a professional game he won't meet it. However, I'm going with weak because he is listed, is sitting on the bench, and there are thus good chances that he'll walk onto the field in the near future. Given this, it may make sense to userfy, and recreate if he gets a game. (It is worth noting that this makes him the only player listed on Birmingham City F.C. to be redlinked, but that seems fair enough). - Bilby (talk) 09:26, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 12:51, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete lack of substantial indepdent biographical coverage. Guy (Help!) 18:12, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. I PRODED this and anon removed the tag so here we are! Hubschrauber729 (talk) 23:12, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. First team game, meaningful cup game, or Olympics.  Until then, non notable. GauchoDude (talk) 04:45, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: Relisted per discussion at my talk page. seicer  &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  17:59, 12 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.