Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semitic Germanic Heritage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 17:09, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Semitic Germanic Heritage

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Exactly one G-hit for this concept: this article, which is pretty fast work for Google's search engines. Unsourced and the creation of indef blocked SPA Holy islamic state of the Germanic Nation. Fails WP:SYNTH, to the degree that any conclusion beyond this concept's existence is made.   Ravenswing   08:04, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

THIS IS NOT TRUE and it is definitely not WP:SYNTH i have created it in few hour and i am working on it i just need time including for the sources.--Holy islamic state of the Germanic Nation (جرمن قوم کے مقدس اسلامی ریاست) 08:08, 13 October 2015 (UTC) please respond here not in the Holy islamic state of the Germanic Nation also known as ISGN--Holy islamic state of the Germanic Nation (جرمن قوم کے مقدس اسلامی ریاست) 08:11, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: You do have time to come up with reliable sources discussing this concept in "significant detail." AfDs are open for seven days.   Ravenswing   08:19, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

*Keep as Semitic and Germanic have a lot of common including language religion and population i think it shows the historical and modern Fusion and relation between them.--206.125.61.133 (talk) 03:49, 14 October 2015 (UTC) *Comment: though it is short it has some revalue and assessment i think it should be expanded or rewrite
 * Delete. No sources found to suggest that this subject can be verified let alone be notable. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 08:10, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: Much of the text is copied from this site, ("user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required"), which is not a reliable source. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:57, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research/synthesis. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:06, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as OR/FRINGE/non-notable subject. Sjö (talk) 11:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research / synthesis. -- The Anome (talk) 12:13, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. A fringe idea which has failed to gain any support among scholars. There may just about be a case for including a brief passing mention of the theory in some article such as Germanic philology, but there is no basis for a free-standing article on the subject. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:07, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep wow an Enjoyable topic!--Shqipërisëtonluk (talk) 04:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as it is a notable subject--206.125.61.2 (talk) 04:51, 14 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.