Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semitic pagan deities


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:12, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Semitic pagan deities
First of all, the whole thing is copied from the link at the bottom and could be considered a copyvio (possibly not speediable since not "blatant"). More importantly, it makes no sense. These are not pagan deities--they are mostly Miltonic angels and devils along with various random creatures from the Bible that were never worshipped by anyone and a few Greek figures thrown in for good measure. They are neither Semitic, nor pagan, nor deities! Chick Bowen 05:56, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Del per nom. &larr;Humus sapiens&larr;ну?
 * Delete per nomination. Kerowyn 09:00, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * There were Semitic deities and, presumably, to someone adhering to an alternative theology, they would be callsed as pagan. I agree these probably aren't they, but this is a valid encyclopaedia entry, and ought not to be deleted out of hand lest, when the "right" information is entered, it is speedy-deleted as an "already-deleted-once".  -- Simon Cursitor 11:14, 6 January 2006 (UTC) who is not sure which vote category this falls under.
 * Any admin would check to make sure it was genuinely the same article before deleting under CSD G-4. Chick Bowen 16:42, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It's a list that tells me nothing. If there is a real article that can be written under this title, it will have different text and not be subject to speedy delete as a 'recreation'. --  Dalbury ( Talk )  14:20, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. By the way Semitic gods already exists (but needs improvement).  Don't even think of merging, as the information in this article is inaccurate.  Logophile 15:51, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Rename to Lame D&Der agglomeration of stuff, misnamed, then Delete. Agree with nominator and Logophile.  Barno 16:30, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Convert to Category: &mdash;gorgan_almighty 17:27, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Not an appropriate category in my view. The word "pagan" is a misnomer.  A Category:West Semitic deities already exists, and contains actual Semitic deities (the ones on this list are not deities at all).  Chick Bowen 17:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. A redirect might help people confused by the modern popular understanding of Yahweh and Allah as the only Semitic deities (neglecting a good bit of history of course, but then, most people couldn't find the Middle East on a map much less speak of what had occurred within a people group thousands of years ago). --eleuthero 20:37, 6 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.