Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sena (record company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Sena (record company)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable ROTM events etc. business. The article is quite old, and seems to have been always virtually unreferenced; now actually so. Not an easy subject to search for, but I tried, and found nothing. Fails WP:GNG / WP:COMPANY. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator, sufficient sources exist in Icelandic. Soz, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - Passes WP:GNG. This is probably the largest entertainment company in Iceland, not just a record company. There are thousands of sources available in the Icelandic media found if you Google "Sena site:*.is". I added a couple of sources for the statements already in the article. Alvaldi (talk) 09:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks . Just to point out that 'thousands of sources' is only relevant if at least some of them provide significant coverage of the company, not passing mentions or coverage only of the company's products and services. That said, based on the sources you've already added, I'm happy to withdraw this nom. Cheers, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.