Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Senaka Dharmatilleke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:02, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Senaka Dharmatilleke

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article hasn't established notability - doesn't comply with WP:PROF or WP:CREATIVE. Dan arndt (talk) 06:22, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 06:26, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 06:30, 30 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Was going to nominate it myself, but figured I'd let someone else check it first. Sulfurboy (talk) 10:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Clearly not notable enough to have an encyclopedic article. Being a Chartered architect is not something uniquely notable. -- Chamith   (talk)  13:29, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose Delete, subject is not only a Doctor (title) Chartered architect but also the Chief Architect of upcoming Havelock City. Article will be further enhanced in the future.DilJco (talk) 01:28, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - Provided reference says he is the design coordinator not the chief architecture. And please note that having "doctor" as title is not a qualification to have a Wikipedia article. -- Chamith   (talk)  03:04, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - might I suggest that if that is the case then the article maybe premature and should be re-created when there is sufficient references to establish notability. Dan arndt (talk) 02:31, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - no claim to notability in the article, just another architect Kraxler (talk) 14:07, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.