Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Senate majority leader


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to Party leaders of the United States Senate. -  Daniel.Bryant  08:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Senate majority leader

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article says hardly anything and the topic is covered elsewhere. The title really relates only to the US Senate, and there seems little point in trying to generalise it - we'll only get into issues of global perspective. Peeper 10:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Party leaders of the United States Senate, which is the ultimate destination of United States Senate Majority Leader. If there are enough other countries where the majority leader in the Senate is called that (and not the "Leader of the Government in the Senate" or something else), it may make sense to do something else. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:21, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Party leaders of the United States Senate. Everything that we could want for the the SML entry is there. Naraht 11:01, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above - my first instinct was to argue for its expansion to reflect a global perspective, but on reflection, the number of different legislatures described as "Senate" around the world is too great, and too diverse, to have one useful article on this topic. A disambiguation page might be a good idea, however. Walton monarchist89 12:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect, however I would suggest it point to Floor Leader instead. --UsaSatsui 16:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Naraht & BigHaz. "Floor Leader" is wrong because it is not limited to the Senate.--Dhartung | Talk 19:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * redirect not enough content for an article yet, especially since there are no sources.--Sefringle 06:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.