Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SendSocial


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 21:59, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

SendSocial

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested PROD. Of the sources listed about this startup, one MIGHT be non-trivial (although it does read like a press-release), the remainder are youtube, and blog entries, a search on google news doesn't turn up anything related to this company. It just doesn't seem like SendSocial is notable, yet - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.... 2 says you, says two 20:45, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- --RrburkeekrubrR 22:50, 20 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - One article in the Telegraph ≠ WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:CORP.  Should be mentioned in Ben Way, but doesn't merit a standalone article. --RrburkeekrubrR 22:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, not yet notable. Haakon (talk) 23:03, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - A notable aspect of SendSocial is the way it was formed, by using social media to bring together a team. The article will be improved soon. Some other citations have now been included. Derbian85 (talk) 22:51, 22 February 2010 (UTC) — Derbian85 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * The way a group is formed does not equal notability. Notability comes from coverage in reliable, third party, non-blog sources. 2 says you, says two 05:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Added further sources in the way of regional and local publications, which can be considered reliable and they are not blogs. Now has 10 independent references. Derbian85 (talk) 16:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not notable enough, this just reads as an 'About Us' page. RanJayJay (talk) 19:59, 24 February 2010 (UTC) — RanJayJay (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.