Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Send It Up


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Whether the article deserves its GA status is a matter for WP:GAR, not here. RL0919 (talk) 06:36, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Send It Up

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is only one source, MTV, talking about the song directly the rest is either about the remix or album reviews, one doesn't establish notability since there needs to be multiple. It has not won one or more significant awards or honors, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury...or was independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands, or groups. Therefore it doesn't pass WP:NS. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 02:51, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:25, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:25, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 04:40, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I note that this article is a WP:GA. Could a non-notable article have gotten far enough to become a GA? Is not the fact that it is GA proof enough of its notability? There were clearly enough sources to write a GA. I also would find it extremely demoralizing to delete a good article. Perhaps that's a bad argument, but if so then its time to have village pump discussion about it. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 04:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:21, 4 January 2020 (UTC)


 * . GA criteria do not mention notability. Enough sources to write an article does not mean enough independent sources with significant coverage to demonstrate notability. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs  talk 17:47, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment There is currently a discussion regarding the recent slew of AfDs by this nominator at WT:SONGS. —Ojorojo (talk) 18:27, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I am not a fan of deleting Good Articles before reassessment, nor do I think the GA review of this rather short music article demonstrated how it was Good. In looking at the sources it seems they are almost exclusively focused on Yeezus the album rather than Send It Up the song, so for that reason I vote to Merge. ⌚️ (talk) 19:56, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. WP:GA, heaps of refs. Doctorhawkes (talk) 10:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - there are plenty of sources. "Significant coverage" does not have to be primarily about a song, as long as the artist and his album and/or the tour are discussed in context. FWIW, not only am I not a fan, I don't like Kanye West, nor his wife, nor his music. Based on the discussion linked by, "charting" confers automatic notability only for "Top 10" songs on Billboard, and "supplemental" sources count more for notability per WP:NSONG. Songs that are not singles are not automatically deleted, but are sometimes merged. Am I right? Merge if necessary. Bearian (talk) 21:10, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per reasons above – zmbro (talk) 04:06, 11 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.