Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seneca Technologies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was d e lete. east. 718 at 04:00, 11/13/2007

Seneca Technologies

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Possibly falls under WP:NOT but there seems to be notability asserted and third-party sources. I've declined the speedy tag (although I can understand why it was placed in the first place) brought this to the community for a more final representative decision and take no position. Accounting4Taste 07:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. While FOIA-pertinent info is beneficial, not sure if there's nough else on the company to warrant their own article.  Recommend pilfering FOIA-related info to add to articles related to that and delete this company article. - CobaltBlueTony 14:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete -- less than 100 unique Google hits; nothing in Google News or Google News Archive. I note that the article was created by a user with a similar name, Senecawill. Finally, please see the discussion at Talk:Seneca Technologies.-- A. B. (talk) 16:47, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the lists of Business-related deletions and West Virginia-related deletions. -- A. B. (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the lists of Business-related deletions and West Virginia-related deletions. -- A. B. (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.