Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Senet Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 00:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Senet Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article or that I can find meet the criteria, just mainly a bunch of (regurgitated or not) company PR.  HighKing++ 12:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:07, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Companies.  HighKing++ 12:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Internet.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - Page is made up of press releases and churnalism. A quick search found nothing meeting WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:02, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is a major company in the WPLAN space, providing networks for IoT devices. There are tons of articles about it. It was recently announced that they are being purchased. I have updated the article to reflect this and added 3 new citations. Maxcreator (talk) 23:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
 * These are all churnalism. Look at the dates and what they discuss. It is routine coverage of an acquisition that was sparked by a press release and then reprinted in blogs or industry publications. Doesn't come close to [{WP:ORGCRIT]]. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. The sources provided are either not independent because they are press releases or trivial reporting on run-of-the-mill corporate events. I could not find significant coverage in reliable sources. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:57, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.