Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Senior Member, Board of Revenue, Sindh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 17:24, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Senior Member, Board of Revenue, Sindh

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article is about a position within a sub-division of the local government of the Pakistani province of Sindh. While this seems like a distinctly niche topic, I would not object to its notability if there was coverage about the position itself (that is, not about its holders). The article is unreferenced and I have not found any significant coverage of the position. Yes, there is a government website proving that this position exists, but existence does not equal notability according to WP:GNG. Modussiccandi (talk) 09:28, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 09:28, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 09:28, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

I disagree, because there are many positions such as those of Ministers which are junior to SMBR. SMBR even according to Wikipedia's page on Sindh Government regards SMBR as one of Sindh's top positions. Categories can be easily added and I recommend that they are done at the soonest.  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment No significant coverage cited. Improvement needed by adding more independent, reliable sources. Multi7001 (talk) 18:38, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 02:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Improvement needed to add more independent sources. There are official websites on this position, suggesting its importance, however more verification is needed. Suggestion to give deadlines, or otherwise to remove page if independent sources not added. Burberry999 (talk) 18:29, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

That is understandable, however the two arguments above are extremely different. While one is arguing that the page is not relevant, the other is arguing regarding the credibility of the specific page and not the topic itself. Therefore I suggest to clear the page from deletion, and give it a certain time period in which the suggestions can be implemented. If they have not been done so in that given time-frame we may go ahead and delete the page.IBRAHIMNAWAZOVO (talk) 07:46, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

very much in shock to see that one could say that the topic of SMBR is not relevant. perhaps the user should re-direct their focus on pages regarding other topics or shall perhaps education themselves in topics of such matter. The issue of adding more sources is not an issue and can be resolved. Even if not resolved, it does not warrant one to delete the entire page, and that is devoid of all logic.Arhsquad01 (talk) 08:03, 4 September 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete or Redirect and selective merge to Board of Revenue, Sindh.4meter4 (talk) 06:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Curbon7 (talk) 05:07, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - this administrative role at the provincial level does not seem inherently notable. And the sources do not suggest it is either. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.