Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Senior seminar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Seminar. (non-admin closure) clpo13(talk) 19:16, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Senior seminar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is an entirely obvious definition of a generic term. This is not an encyclopedic subject, and it's not an encyclopedia article. The citations are either WP:EL posed as fake citations or just general coursework. The rest is WP:NOTDIR. The content was abandoned, as there is no encyclopedic premise or possibility for expansion. — Smuckola(talk) 20:41, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  23:41, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
 * delete - I previously nominated this article for deletion, and I still think it ought to be deleted. Yes, the word seminar is often used with the word senior preceding it as a qualifier, however it does nto follow that this is a notable topic. --Salimfadhley (talk) 00:34, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge into seminar or some other related article, I think the information is suitable for the encyclopedia, but not as a standalone article. Also it's not really WP:NOTDIR because knowing where such courses are offered is relevant information.--Prisencolin (talk) 01:47, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Delete or Merge into seminar for reasons indicated previously. No references.  Generic (and non-encyclopedic) discussion. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 19:33, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Your username is too broken to function in a notification template, so I don't know if you'll see this. The prose is written in a vague yet globally subjective way, so it is entirely unencyclopedic. As such, there's nothing to merge unless you call the salvaging of a sentence fragment or two for some reason a "merge". There's just no meaningful content here, as the reader would need to already know everything about the subject in order to decipher it. It should have never been created. Thank you. — Smuckola(talk) 12:51, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Jkudlick t c s 02:56, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:55, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 00:40, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect in any case as there's nothing outstanding to suggest a better separate article. SwisterTwister   talk  20:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.