Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sensatio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 14:46, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Sensatio
Article is written as an advertisement for a software package which appears non-notable; "sensatio" gets lots of google hits, but "sensatio binaural" gets 28 unique. 74 downloads at download.com, 60 at softpedia. and I'm not even gonna get into the alpha-waves thing. prod disputed, so... Delete. bikeable (talk) 05:11, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * You should consider that this product is the evolution of an older one... Maybe people should inform and add information before delete something. Or -at least- discuss it. I'm talking about many people, nobody in spec. Do whatever you want, whatever you feel it's right, BUT always discuss it before, isn't that right Where are the limits ? 70, 700, how much is "a lot"? Why Sensatio Binaural keywords on Google? Is everything on Google? Science Magazines doesn't even exists? Just because you don't know it, it doesn't means you can delete whatever is new for you. Again, I'm talking to nobody in particular, this is a retoric question..- BTW; Why there's still a link in Meditation to a free program and the link is still there, and that link was there before my free contribution for wikipedia. This is a constructive article, do whatever you feel it's correct, but we should always be respectful with the collaborations and opinions from other people on wikipedia.
 * Delete as spam, unless someone can cite reliable sources. Fagstein 05:39, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator. I don't see any references to articles in Scientific Journals or Magazines.  If the author would like us to consider these, he must tell us where to find them.  Respect the process here and you will get respect.  -MrFizyx 15:14, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * delete as per nom & Fagstein, and NN software. Pete.Hurd 21:36, 23 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.