Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sensitive skin type


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Now the copyvio is no longer in the article, consensus is that this is a valid article. Davewild (talk) 08:41, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Sensitive skin type

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Appears to be a copy of "Cosmetic dermatology: principles and practice" by Leslie Baumann. All of the previous entries by the article creator all seem to be WP:COPYVIOTokyogirl79 (talk) 07:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Additional: The article would require a complete re-write from head to toe, unfortunately.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:10, 23 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79


 * Keep I have made a complete rewrite from head to toe, reducing the article to a stub but providing links to substantial sources including a comprehensive review. Warden (talk) 11:19, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:40, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

The material in this Wikipedia submission is widely known in the dermatologic community and is the subject of multiple publications. This material was adapted with permission from publications including The Skin Type Solution (Bantam 2005) and Cosmetic Dermatology (McGraw Hill 2009) written by Dr. Leslie Baumann MD.. Metabeauty Inc, holds the copy right to these publications and agrees to permit Wikipedia to use this adapted content. Metabeauty will accept responsibility for the use of these content on Wikipedia. I can provide a letter of agreement from metabeauty if necessary. Please let me know how to proceed. This material is also excerpted with permission from US patent number US2006/0265244 A1 which was filed by Dr. Leslie Baumann and is owned by Metabeauty Inc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firstpaigeinc (talk • contribs) 16:03, 24 October 2011 (UTC) — Firstpaigeinc (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * The above is an admission that the article is a copyvio and that the author has no authority to grant license for use of the text. See [Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Baumann_skin_types].  Blanking page and re-tagging for speedy copyvio.  EEng (talk) 19:10, 24 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Nomination was do to copyvio problems, which have been removed. You can click the Google news archive link at the top of the AFD, and find proof easily enough that this is a real thing, and it does get coverage.   D r e a m Focus  02:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep – Copyvio matters have been addressed, and per availability of reliable sources: . Northamerica1000 (talk) 10:03, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.