Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sententiaism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. &mdash; J I P | Talk 06:34, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

Sententiaism
I'd say this was original research, except it appears to claim more to be original prophecy. Either way, it's a WP:NOR violation. The Literate Engineer 04:44, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete hopelessly POV original essay. --Fire Star 05:10, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete As per nomination. Jwissick  (t)  (c)  05:26, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete rambling POV CLW 07:07, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research. utcursch | talk 08:06, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, personal essay, original research. I like it, but I'm afraid it's not an encyclopedia article. Sounds a bit like the Quaker Inward Light to me. "It is forbidden for separate denominations to be formed of Sententiaism" recalls Margaret Fell's "Theology divides, service unites." Dpbsmith (talk) 00:04, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.