Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sentinel hypothesis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as a copyright violation of David Darling's article by the same name, which this article helpfully links to and which it is word-for-word identical to, even down to the formatting of the references, which isn't the Wikipedia house style. This article was created in 2006. Darling's was written in 2004, according to the Wayback Machine. Uncle G (talk) 16:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Sentinel hypothesis

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Inherent OR, no citation or evidence that the basic premise of this article is anything other than one author's theory based on a work of fiction Markeer 14:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - When one of two references for a supposed scientific hypothesis is a work of fiction, there's trouble. LonelyBeacon (talk) 16:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.