Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seo monitor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 07:30, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Seo monitor

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod tag was lost in a confusing edit sequence which included speedy tagging (and declining thereof) as advert. Non-notable software, still in beta testing. Delete.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 14:50, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, Software under development that does not have non-trivial coverage in multiple reliable sources, not-notable. A new name 2008 (talk) 18:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete I disagree with the admin.  This could have been tagged with  (CSD-A7), given their primary face .  Just because they also happen to have a firefox extension does not magically exempt them.  Further, I see software projects ed all of the time.  There is ongoing discussion on improving the g11 criteria, but there is a definite precedent for deleting both web pages & software under that criteria. --Karnesky (talk) 18:12, 8 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete- as the original nomintaer this article is merely spam in my opinion. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 19:22, 8 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:N. A speedy tag for software would indeed be appropriate. --bonadea contributions talk 20:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, obvious advertising for non-notable, non-consumer software. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:14, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

I'd like to remind people or wp:snow and suggest this thread be closed and article deleted. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 14:20, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.