Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seomyeon medical street


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. No consensus to delete per changes by CMBJ v/r - TP 02:46, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Seomyeon medical street

 * – ( View AfD View log )

According to one administrator no promotion or spam. To my opinion it is a blatant advertisement. Please opinions. Night of the Big Wind talk  14:14, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 20 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment I'm the administrator; Night reverted me when I declined the G12 speedy and has since lashed out at my talk page. No opinion on deleting or keeping.  Nyttend (talk) 19:02, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * To correct this a bit: for my so called lashing out and for his big words. But let us go back to the article... Night of the Big Wind  talk  22:46, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'm doing a little research and it looks like it is a pretty notable thing. I'm trying to find some links that could be considered reliable. I think it does come across a little advertise-y, but that might be due to the very short length of the article. I'm neutral about keeping it so far, relying on being able to find reliable sources.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:24, 21 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Additional. It's a little hard to find links due to the language barrier but I found a few and posted them on the article's talk page. This might benefit from being incubated/userfied for a while until better sources can be found (if mine aren't good enough and it doesn't survive AfD). At the very least this absolutely merits a mention on the medical tourism page. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:44, 21 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79


 * Comment - I'm not sure if this should be a standalone article, or re-purposed to an an article on the central business district called "Seomyeon". Artcles like this would indicate that the overall business district is notable, but we would need an article.  As for the medical businesses there, this article could be merged or redirected to it if it were created.  And slightly off-topic, I agree that declining the speedy deletion request was correct.  This is not unambiguous advertising. -- Whpq (talk) 17:04, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Busan and merge a sentence or two into that section. If there is notability here, I am unable to find it in English. --MelanieN (talk) 22:10, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 01:05, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Comment the intended analogy is Harley Street, but there needs to be some evidence for the general use.  DGG ( talk ) 06:01, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 01:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Busan. There is notability here but just not enough to warrant an article to itself at this time. When I did searches it looked like this was a relatively new idea, being only a few years old. I say that we redirect for the time being and incubate this until more sources are available. I also think it'd be best redirected to the shopping and commerce section since that's where Seomyeon is mentioned in the article. I added two sentences from the existing article and to be honest, nothing was really lost. There's already a mention of that area also being the entertainment district so it wasn't necessary to take anything else. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:14, 8 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Delete. Article is awful - not sourced (well, what would there be?), not categorized, and can't see an obvious purpose to it. Most towns have business districts.  Skip the redirect and remove it. --Legis (talk - contribs) 08:11, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm making an attempt to rescue the article. For reference, here's a link to the content as of nomination. —  C M B J   11:43, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as revised. Adequately referenced for notability. Not promotional.  DGG ( talk ) 16:05, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Changing vote to keep. The revision looks great and seems to be well sourced.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:15, 18 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.