Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seoul Tourism Awards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 17:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Seoul Tourism Awards

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable award which effectively serves the purpose of rewarding people who promote tourism in Seoul. The awards don't seem to have any significant coverage in third-party sources aside from trivial mentions and promotional pieces. There are no mainspace pages that link to the article either, apart from List of awards and nominations received by NewJeans. The article has only had a few edits made since its creation 15 years ago, mostly by bots. Aydoh8 (talk &#124; contribs) 11:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards, Travel and tourism,  and South Korea. Aydoh8 (talk &#124; contribs) 11:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  12:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:31, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep because of notability. I encourage you to search for articles about the award in Korean; the award has a ton of non trivial and non (at least it seems like) promotional coverage.
 * 
 * I can look up more upon request.
 * Also I'd argue the lack of activity and links is much more secondary to coverage. 211.43.120.242 (talk) 12:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - I'm seeing quite a bit of significant coverage on Korean sources, especially on some bigger Korean news sites like YTN like here and Kyunghyang Shinmun (linked above). If anything, the Wikipedia article just needs some updating.  MetropolitanIC   (💬&#124;📝) 02:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GNG. Sufficient coverage exists in a number of reliable Korean-language sources. The article absolutely needs work, but the sources do exist. GhostOfNoMeme 09:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.