Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Separation (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Richard Rohmer. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:15, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Separation (novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced almost plot-only article about a probably non-notable book failing WP:PLOT, WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG. Just like Ultimatum (novel) from the same author this would need radical plot-trimming and adding of additional encyclopedic information. But I wasn't able to find reliable sources for that. GermanJoe (talk) 19:46, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  20:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:29, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge to Richard Rohmer (plot could do with editing, but there's a template for that). Google books shows quite a few brief mentions, and as something adapted into a TV movie there are likely to be more sources; however proving notability is hard without access to a Canadian newspaper library. Colapeninsula (talk) 09:33, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk  09:58, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge A sentence or two in the article for the author would be sufficient. I only find social site reviews, nothing more. Plot and characters make sense on WP only for books that are either extremely popular (e.g. Harry Potter) or highly studied (e.g. War and Peace). This is neither. Note that the article for the author is also lacking references. I would like to see at least full citations for the books, including publishers, so we can have a reasonable publishing history. LaMona (talk) 15:32, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.