Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Separation of style and content

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 00:36, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)

Separation of style and content
Delete That's exactly why there is CSS. I believe most of the content is already cover in the CSS article. --Minghong 18:56, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, I don't believe Cascading Style Sheets are the only example of separation of style and content. Kappa 19:41, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Kappa's right, it is possible to separate style and content without using CSS. This article should be expanded to deal with the subject more generally. DaveTheRed 23:08, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep.  It's a great introductory article on the separation of style and content, which is surprisingly hard to find on the web. It's especially helpful for people from a non-IT background, such as recordkeepers and information managers, which is my intented audience and research area.  --Ness79 04:36, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * User's only edit. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 00:36, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, cleanup and expand. Megan1967 05:25, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * If this can't be merged with something, it should be deleted. Edeans 03:38, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Move to semantic markup and expand to describe LaTeX as well. grendel|khan 06:20, 2005 Mar 19 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. (I created this article, and I agree it needs some cleanup (especially the large portion of it that came from 4.x))  ~leif &#9786; HELO 21:04, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.