Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Septagon Studios Inc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-17 21:22Z 

Septagon Studios Inc

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Already prodded and deleted for non-notability. Disputed prod with no reason given. Appears non-notable and reads as promotional. ShadowHalo 05:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Methinks a PR agency wrote this. Promotional, very non-notable. Realkyhick 06:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I just edited it. I wrote the article I'm also the president of the company. I followed guidelines like the other comic book companies.NYXX 1:11Am, 12 February 2007
 * Comment Generally, people involved with a company should refrain from editing the article on that company, due to the conflict of interest issues. Veinor (talk to me) 23:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I can't really declare notability one way or the other, but the article, if it is kept, must be rewritten. Phrases like "Nicola Defina, creator and visionary, whose lifelong dream of breaking into the comic book industry is finally being realized" and "Nicola has established a sturdy base to help attract readers and make Septagon Studios the best it can be" belong on some shitty P.R. newsletter that nobody ever reads, not on an encyclopedia. --Action Jackson IV 07:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - no independent reliable sources to establish notability, fails WP:CORP and possibly WP:SPAM, and has already been prodded with no sources produced. MastCell 21:16, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment If this article were to be rewritten would it be able to stay? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NYXX (talk • contribs).
 * It depends on how it was rewritten. Essentially, it needs to be shown that there are multiple third-party sources that have written about Septagon Studios.  ShadowHalo 13:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree that it sounds like a PR text and isn't really in place here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.30.227.92 (talk) 15:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete. No evidence of having published real books of note. John Vandenberg 06:32, 17 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.