Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/September Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge to Analytical Marxism, which is compatible with the "not notable" opinions for deletion expressed here. Sandstein (talk) 21:14, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

September Group

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Claimed group of somewhat known persons but are we shure it exists for real or is it just some friends invinting other friends like a biannual poker game? A cigarclub is not more notable just because its members unless some deeds are done on itself or it has other qualifications. Skull and Bones is a good examle of such entity. September group is its opposite. Boongoman (talk) 09:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete If there are no references added showing independent notability for the group then it should be deleted. Alberon (talk) 09:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't find a display of sarcastic ignorance impressive as a deletion rationale. That said, merge and redirect to Analytical Marxism, whose history closely tracks this group. Although there is information in Google Books and Google Scholar that will suitably verify the information, it is not independent of the membership. --Dhartung | Talk 11:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge is fine with me. Censorship is not the point with this AfD. --Boongoman (talk) 16:58, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ORG. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 12:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * There's plenty of information about this particular group, in- and outside the web. So yes, we "are sure" that it's not "just some friends inviting other friends". Do not merge, let it be. If anything, learn more about the group and expand the article. Popperipopp (talk) 18:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.