Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sequanne McCargo

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 08:32, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

Sequanne McCargo
Why do people write lame-ass vanity like this? And why can't we just speedy it? -R. fiend 17:46, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as vanity.   &mdash; J I P | Talk 17:51, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Either it's vanity, or it's an attack page. I believe we're discussing a semi-speedy process for these at Deletion policy/Reducing VfD load. -- BD2412 talk 17:55, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC) (why, yes, I did change my signature again). ;-)
 * Delete. 65.104.189.195 19:06, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Toss it, and let's get that semi-speedy process up and running. jglc | t | c 19:43, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity. --Etacar11 22:28, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity. JamesBurns 07:40, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Not notable, attack page. Delete, candidate for speedy deletion. - Mike Rosoft 18:39, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Either vanity or attack page. Double Blue  (Talk) 01:03, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .