Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sequentialism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. enochlau (talk) 23:29, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Sequentialism
Google turns up nothing on this Lindström chap. Therefore, no historical interest and non-notable. Daniel Case 06:35, 4 January 2006 (UTC)]] 'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!' enochlau (talk) 15:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * delete rediscovered and reinvented by Lucian Einhorn (aka Lucian Winston) in late December of 2005 is a bit of a giveaway. MNewnham 16:57, 4 January 2006 (UTC)]]
 * Delete. Appears to be a hoax. Johnleemk | Talk 15:45, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Stoner nonsense. --Malthusian (talk) 16:41, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Johnleemk. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 16:52, 10 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.