Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serbdom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Serbian nationalism. Consensus to not keep. Whether to merge something from the history to the target article is subject to editorial consensus.  Sandstein  08:13, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Serbdom

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article was listed for discussion back in 2011, and hasn't been worked on since. There are no reliable references and inline citations in the article. There seems to be a confusion over what "Serbdom" really means — patriotism, nationalism, or ethno-religious identity. I can safely conclude that this is an ambiguous term. The article, which has no relevant content or history (copy from Serbian nationalism and articles on folk attire) should be deleted. In the future, if appropriate, it may be redirected to a better suited article. --Z oupan 13:05, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * The previous nomination was actually a move request. Pardon me for the template name.--Z oupan 13:28, 26 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - bad article, not worth saving. -- Ąnαșταη  ( ταlκ )  00:01, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:48, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak keep Merge and/or redirect to Serbian nationalism, where it mentioned. The definition (or definitions) seems a bit vague, but people keep referring to it. William Jovanovich wrote a book titled Serbdom. However, most of the article, other than Marko Miljanov's quote, consists of random facts about Serbs or Serbia and should be deleted. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:24, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * That is why an article confusing all definitions, without mentioning this fact, should be deleted. The term should be added to Wiktionary.--Z oupan 06:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Serbdom at Wiktionary. All interlinks to "Serbdom" should be linked to the wiktionary entry instead.--Z oupan 07:10, 3 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: Not a proper name, and as such, it should go to Wictionary as per Zoupan. MorenaReka (talk) 17:34, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Between Weak keep and Merge with Serbian nationalism article. If the article does get deleted some of its content ought to be merged into Serbian nationalism. However keep is warranted too as it is a term. Probably someone needs to do a little google books and scholar search for any new peer reviewed material that has been published on the matter to expand. Some articles do become idle however because that's all the material that is out there has been published or the editor writing does not have enough expertise to expand it. This page could also become like the Kosovar one giving a small amount of info on the term as it does exist. Best.Resnjari (talk) 18:39, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * , exactly what "content"? There is none. The page should obviously not be kept. "Serbness", which "Srpstvo" translates to, has no equivalent in Wikipedia.--Z oupan 19:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * There are three references to Serbdom in the Serbian nationalism article without having a sentence explaining it. By merge i mean that, whatever relevant info this article might have for its incorporation into that article elaborating on "Serbdom" so the reader at the very least knows what is meant by the term and its use in Serbian nationalism.Resnjari (talk) 19:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Do you know what wiktionary is for? Where the term is used, a wikt:Serbdom will be added (as said above). There is no relevant info, as already said.--Z oupan 19:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Then add it. The term is used 3 times in the Serbian nationalism article (used in quotes). A reader may want to know what is meant by Serbdom. If that's taken care of then yeah, possible deletion would suffice unless someone else has a concern with it.Resnjari (talk) 09:35, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Done.--Z oupan 21:32, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and move to Wiktionary (vague term/political phrase with no fixed meaning), along with the article Serbenda, which makes even less sense, since it is a pejorative term for a Serb nationalist and nothing more, like Crnogorčina in Montenegro or  'Rvatina  in Croatia. Nothing worthy of an encyclopedic article. Sideshow Bob 12:22, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Already present at wiktionary.--Z oupan 21:32, 4 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Merge with Serbian nationalism article. Whatever is useful should go there as a "Srpstvo" section. If there is nothing useful, then delete.--Mondiad (talk) 15:10, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Nothing useful.--Z oupan 21:32, 4 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Merge anything of substance into Serbian nationalism, of which this appears to be a sub-topic. -Bryanrutherford0 (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.