Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serbia in the Yugoslav Wars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. WP:SNOW The Bushranger One ping only 22:16, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Serbia in the Yugoslav Wars

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

The language of this article is inflammatory and biased. Specifically, using inflammatory language such as "propaganda" and only referring to war atrocities to Serbs. Sphorbis (talk) 23:06, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 July 10.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  23:24, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Serbia was strongly involved in mass murders, rape, torture and genocide in Croatia and Bosnia during the Yugoslav wars of the mid-1990's. No one can hide these facts. They supplied the Bosnian and Croatian Serbs with heavy weaponry and tanks that destroyed the city of Vukovar and killed thousands of people in Sarajevo. Was the massacre of Vukovar here a lie? This is not inflammatory...its the truth. Serbia indirectly killed hundreds of thousands of Bosnian Muslims in the 1990's through their Bosnian Serb proxies. But perhaps the article regarding the Kosovo war of 1999 should be reduced since the scale of Serb atrocities against the Kosovars was less until NATO intervened on Kosovo's behalf. Just my opinion. This is my only edit here. Thank You, --Artene50 (talk) 01:38, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. We are talking about an interesting, if tragic, piece of recent history of South-East Europe, which should be remembered. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 09:53, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep unless the nominator can point to actual Reasons for deletion rather than what is at best a content dispute and at worst a simple failure to match their POV. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 10:38, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep: the problem the nominator wants to address with deletion can be addressed with editing. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 11:01, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Agreed - this is case of a problem which should be dealt with by editing, not by deletion. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 15:36, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 11:44, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 11:44, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kosovo-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 11:44, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 11:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 11:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 11:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 11:46, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep There are other ways to deal with bias.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 13:33, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.